<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wide-Angle Fun, or Why You Don&#8217;t Shoot People at 12mm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.timkettering.com/2008/03/31/wide-angle-fun-or-why-you-dont-shoot-people-at-12mm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.timkettering.com/2008/03/31/wide-angle-fun-or-why-you-dont-shoot-people-at-12mm/</link>
	<description>photography, blathering and snarky friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:59:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sarah tullier</title>
		<link>http://blog.timkettering.com/2008/03/31/wide-angle-fun-or-why-you-dont-shoot-people-at-12mm/comment-page-1/#comment-13816</link>
		<dc:creator>sarah tullier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 04:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackcore.com/2008/03/31/wide-angle-fun-or-why-you-dont-shoot-people-at-12mm/#comment-13816</guid>
		<description>LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLL

yesss come back! :)  

and i loved the wedding you shot-  keep it up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLL</p>
<p>yesss come back! :)  </p>
<p>and i loved the wedding you shot-  keep it up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tate</title>
		<link>http://blog.timkettering.com/2008/03/31/wide-angle-fun-or-why-you-dont-shoot-people-at-12mm/comment-page-1/#comment-13398</link>
		<dc:creator>tate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 12:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackcore.com/2008/03/31/wide-angle-fun-or-why-you-dont-shoot-people-at-12mm/#comment-13398</guid>
		<description>As unflattering as that lens was, I think they&#039;re cool photos. YES, come visit sometime again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As unflattering as that lens was, I think they&#8217;re cool photos. YES, come visit sometime again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cuong aka buzz</title>
		<link>http://blog.timkettering.com/2008/03/31/wide-angle-fun-or-why-you-dont-shoot-people-at-12mm/comment-page-1/#comment-13278</link>
		<dc:creator>cuong aka buzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 19:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackcore.com/2008/03/31/wide-angle-fun-or-why-you-dont-shoot-people-at-12mm/#comment-13278</guid>
		<description>i would not attempt to shoot groom and bride with wide angles at the wedding. unless groom and bride don&#039;t want their friends to be prettier than groom and bride themselves then photographer has to put their friends at the 4 corners far away and keep groom and bride in center of frame where it is safe spot.

did you notice the first photo of tim&#039;s head looked like the cone come from alien&#039;s birth. but in real life, his head is more handsome than this photo therefore wide lenses is dangerous to use properly.

btw, i used the wide for getting the sense of perspective. if i want beautiful or handsome portrait then i rather recommend 80-200 mm rather than wide angles. unless you want photo looks drunk then wide angles is great effect!

buzz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i would not attempt to shoot groom and bride with wide angles at the wedding. unless groom and bride don&#8217;t want their friends to be prettier than groom and bride themselves then photographer has to put their friends at the 4 corners far away and keep groom and bride in center of frame where it is safe spot.</p>
<p>did you notice the first photo of tim&#8217;s head looked like the cone come from alien&#8217;s birth. but in real life, his head is more handsome than this photo therefore wide lenses is dangerous to use properly.</p>
<p>btw, i used the wide for getting the sense of perspective. if i want beautiful or handsome portrait then i rather recommend 80-200 mm rather than wide angles. unless you want photo looks drunk then wide angles is great effect!</p>
<p>buzz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://blog.timkettering.com/2008/03/31/wide-angle-fun-or-why-you-dont-shoot-people-at-12mm/comment-page-1/#comment-13271</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 17:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackcore.com/2008/03/31/wide-angle-fun-or-why-you-dont-shoot-people-at-12mm/#comment-13271</guid>
		<description>you can shoot people with wide angles, just that the results may not always be flattering!

generally wide angles are used to shoot landscapes, interior shots or just for the weird, freaky effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you can shoot people with wide angles, just that the results may not always be flattering!</p>
<p>generally wide angles are used to shoot landscapes, interior shots or just for the weird, freaky effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://blog.timkettering.com/2008/03/31/wide-angle-fun-or-why-you-dont-shoot-people-at-12mm/comment-page-1/#comment-13267</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackcore.com/2008/03/31/wide-angle-fun-or-why-you-dont-shoot-people-at-12mm/#comment-13267</guid>
		<description>What are wide angles lens typically being used for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are wide angles lens typically being used for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

